<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Patriots Still Interested in Pacman?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.patriotsblog.net/2008/04/11/patriots-still-interested-in-pacman/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.patriotsblog.net/2008/04/11/patriots-still-interested-in-pacman/</link>
	<description>A New England Patriots Blog and Community</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:26:14 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: 2244slayer</title>
		<link>http://www.patriotsblog.net/2008/04/11/patriots-still-interested-in-pacman/comment-page-1/#comment-1218</link>
		<dc:creator>2244slayer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 00:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patsblog.wordpress.com/?p=448#comment-1218</guid>
		<description>Birds of a feather........given that the Pats are a criminal enterprise and consistently engaged in illeegal wiretaping, its not surprising that they may be interested in Pacman.  Pacman just likes to &quot;tap&quot; women, but maybe he can add video taping to his skill set.  God knows that Pats know how to teach that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Birds of a feather&#8230;&#8230;..given that the Pats are a criminal enterprise and consistently engaged in illeegal wiretaping, its not surprising that they may be interested in Pacman.  Pacman just likes to &#8220;tap&#8221; women, but maybe he can add video taping to his skill set.  God knows that Pats know how to teach that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lamont</title>
		<link>http://www.patriotsblog.net/2008/04/11/patriots-still-interested-in-pacman/comment-page-1/#comment-1215</link>
		<dc:creator>lamont</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Apr 2008 05:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patsblog.wordpress.com/?p=448#comment-1215</guid>
		<description>the pratriots will go undefeeted for the 2009 season</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the pratriots will go undefeeted for the 2009 season</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PATSfanSERBIA</title>
		<link>http://www.patriotsblog.net/2008/04/11/patriots-still-interested-in-pacman/comment-page-1/#comment-1214</link>
		<dc:creator>PATSfanSERBIA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 17:53:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patsblog.wordpress.com/?p=448#comment-1214</guid>
		<description>Greg , j know abouth risk with Jones,but j think that risk is minimal! This is his last chance and he will be motivated to prove himself!!! Us need CB,him need new club!
 For me giving 4th round pick for him isnt bad idea!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Greg , j know abouth risk with Jones,but j think that risk is minimal! This is his last chance and he will be motivated to prove himself!!! Us need CB,him need new club!<br />
 For me giving 4th round pick for him isnt bad idea!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.patriotsblog.net/2008/04/11/patriots-still-interested-in-pacman/comment-page-1/#comment-1216</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Apr 2008 12:51:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patsblog.wordpress.com/?p=448#comment-1216</guid>
		<description>Randy Moss was a perennial superstar but we got him for a fourth round pick.  Why, because he was a risk.  Doesn&#039;t matter what round a player is taken in.  W. Welker wasn&#039;t a risk, when we traded for him, I predicted he would have at least 100 catches.

So, you have a guy that has committed crimes, could screw up your chemistry, and hasn&#039;t proved very much in the league.  He&#039;s been out of football for a year, and no one knows what kind of shape he is.  The Titans might ask for a third or fourth round pick, but I GUARANTEE you, the best they get is a fifth round pick, but more likely a sixth round pick.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randy Moss was a perennial superstar but we got him for a fourth round pick.  Why, because he was a risk.  Doesn&#8217;t matter what round a player is taken in.  W. Welker wasn&#8217;t a risk, when we traded for him, I predicted he would have at least 100 catches.</p>
<p>So, you have a guy that has committed crimes, could screw up your chemistry, and hasn&#8217;t proved very much in the league.  He&#8217;s been out of football for a year, and no one knows what kind of shape he is.  The Titans might ask for a third or fourth round pick, but I GUARANTEE you, the best they get is a fifth round pick, but more likely a sixth round pick.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PATSFanSERBIA</title>
		<link>http://www.patriotsblog.net/2008/04/11/patriots-still-interested-in-pacman/comment-page-1/#comment-1217</link>
		<dc:creator>PATSFanSERBIA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 19:06:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://patsblog.wordpress.com/?p=448#comment-1217</guid>
		<description>Ha ha ha! Jones for 6th or 7th raund?? Good joke....:-D...Adam was 1th raund pick and naw we will trade him for 6-7th raund! J dont share your opinion! You talk abouth risk? We risk with Moss and Wes.W last year and thay have fantastic seasons!!
But haw you sad,that is only rumor. Chance to PaT®IoTs  trade Jones are very little ,something abouth 15%!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha ha ha! Jones for 6th or 7th raund?? Good joke&#8230;.:-D&#8230;Adam was 1th raund pick and naw we will trade him for 6-7th raund! J dont share your opinion! You talk abouth risk? We risk with Moss and Wes.W last year and thay have fantastic seasons!!<br />
But haw you sad,that is only rumor. Chance to PaT®IoTs  trade Jones are very little ,something abouth 15%!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
